But it's very old software, good luck getting it to work at all or not to crash. In theory winmorph + wax could do it, because wax is really compositing software. When you "shrink" a face or object, generally that implies shrinking the face or object only, not the stuff around it as well but maybe that's ok for what you're trying to do ? Or if they claim "video" support, it's really fading entire videos (like an A/B fade transition), not individual objects only without affecting the background or other objects around it. Notice in that link above all the examples have similar homology and nothing is moving - that's because they are really still to still photo morphs, not video source (with motion) examples. "animated masks" - either manually or with motion tracking assist). For generic targets (not necessarily faces) - at minimum you need the ability to work with layers, composite and isolate areas with rotoscoping (ie. #Morph age pro windows software#There are dedicated morphing software that claim to support video such as in the link TreeTops posted above - but you will run into problems when the conditions are less than ideal, moving targets, objects moving in front of your target, etc. If the targets in your videos are all still, and "easy targets", you might not need something like AE or HitFilm - so we need a better understanding of what sorts of expectations you have I already suggested After Effects in your other thread about face swapping and tracking, and I'm going to suggest it again here. There are more challenges and manipulations if you want decent results for video source morphing. Video is more difficult than still to still photo morphing where in the latter - everything is aligned, nothing is moving. What was the old "perfect" mac application ? - so we know what sort of "expectations" you might have
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |